Professional, scientific and technical services
This subsector comprises establishments primarily engaged in activities in which human capital is the major input. These establishments make available the knowledge and skills of their employees, often on an assignment basis. The individual industries of this subsector are defined on the basis of the particular expertise and training of the service provider. — Statistics Canada, NAICS 2022A
- Establishments · CanadaA
- 158,361
- Under 10 employeesA
- 85%
- Establishments · USA
- 974,303
- Employment · USA
- 10,152,104
- Payroll · USA
- $1.07T
Size and shape
How many businesses there are and how small they are. Fragmentation is the first thing an entrant — or anyone selling software into this industry — needs to know, and it is one of the few things that is actually measured.
Canadian establishments by number of employeesA
Of 158,361 Canadian establishments with employees, 85% have fewer than ten — an industry of very small operators.
Where they areA
Largest four provinces by establishment count. Establishments with employees only — sole operators with no payroll are not in this table, so in trades and personal services the true number of businesses is higher.
Measured, not forecast: the share of US establishments opening in one year that were still active later. It counts good operators and bad ones together, which is exactly why it is the honest answer to “what are the odds”. It is for the whole sector rather than this market, and the ten-year figure comes from an older cohort because no younger one has reached ten years.
How businesses here compete
The structural profile of subsector 541, which every industry beneath it inherits. This is analyst judgment from how the subsector is organised — not research into this industry, and not a measurement.
Professional licensing is the barrier and the principal's time is the ceiling. Firms are built from a book of clients, and an aging partner group makes acquisition and succession the common entry.
- Who sets the price
- The firm, by reputation, against hourly-rate comparison.
- The software it runs on
- Practice management, time and billing, and a specialist tool per profession — the densest vertical-software territory in the economy.
Market screens and studies
Market-entry records filed along this branch of the hierarchy. A record at or beneath this code is about this industry; one above it is about something wider that contains it.
The demand is real, large and paid on time by one buyer. The Department of Defense obligated $40.11B of contracts coded to NAICS 541330 in FY2025 [A, USAspending], and $8.81B of it — 22% — went to small businesses [A], so this is not a market sealed shut to anyone under a billion dollars. The mechanism that keeps an ordinary entrant out is that the buyer does not buy from strangers. Booz Allen took about 84% of its FY2026 revenue through 2,426 task orders on IDIQ vehicles [A]: the work is competed among firms already on a vehicle, and getting on one takes past performance on federal contracts that a new firm by definition lacks. Around that sits a stack of eligibility costs paid before the first dollar — personnel and facility security clearances that CACI's 10-K calls 'difficult and time-consuming to obtain' [A], DFARS cost-accounting and audit regimes, and a CMMC third-party cyber certification phasing in from November 2025 to November 2028 that Leidos says decides whether it can bid at all [A]. Scale does not buy much margin either: on FY2025–26 filings operating margin ran from 3.3% at Amentum to 12.3% at Leidos [A, derived], and the primes keep consolidating — CACI paid $2.64B for ARKA in March 2026, Amentum was formed by merging with Jacobs' government business, and KBR is spinning off its mission-technology arm [A]. The reachable lane is therefore a cleared subcontractor or a small-business set-aside holder working under a prime, which is a services firm built around people who already hold clearances and a prime who sponsors them. Canada has the same shape at smaller scale — Calian, the nearest listed Canadian comparable, reported C$774M of FY2025 revenue across defence, health and other lines [A]. Eligibility, not capital, decides it: even a funded entrant waits years for clearances and past performance.
The largest professional-services market in the world and the one where scale decides everything: Accenture turned over $69.7B in fiscal 2025, Infosys $20.158B in fiscal 2026 (year to 31 March 2026, +4.6% reported and +3.1% in constant currency), and CGI — the Canadian comparable — C$15.91B in fiscal 2025, all growing in single digits. Beneath them the work is billable hours with no compounding asset, priced against offshore delivery centres a domestic entrant cannot match. The defensible versions are narrow: one platform, one regulated vertical, one geography. The MSP tooling market at this code is screened separately.
The most attractive-looking and least enterable market in the portfolio. Growth you cannot capture is not an asset.
Cut because the same low barrier that lets you in lets everyone in, and no compounding asset accumulates. Noted as the destination for the AI-governance adjacency identified in the 541514 study — that idea belongs here and deserves its own screen. Sourced update: the only disclosed comparable at scale is Accenture at $69.7B, and it is a technology-services business wearing consulting's clothes. The houses that actually define management consulting are partnerships that publish nothing, which means an entrant cannot benchmark price, margin or share against anyone — the absence of data is itself part of why the category resists defensibility.
The money is real and it is not shrinking. The Defense Logistics Agency alone obligated $55.9B in contracts in FY2025 [A], and the Army's LOGCAP V vehicle has carried $12.5B of task orders since 2019 [A]. But this work is never sold in an open market. It reaches a contractor only through a contract vehicle the contractor already holds, and those vehicles are awarded on past performance at the same scale. LOGCAP V went to exactly four companies in April 2019: KBR, V2X, Fluor and the Amentum–Parsons joint venture. Two of them, KBR and V2X, hold 91% of the obligated dollars [A]. The follow-on goes the other way for a newcomer. The Army's July 2026 notices say LOGCAP VI will merge LOGCAP, Army Pre-Positioned Stock and EAGLE into one global MATOC [A], which makes the next door larger and fewer firms can fit through it. The margins do not pay for the wait either. On filed results, V2X earned a 4.3% operating margin and Fluor's Mission Solutions segment 3.5% in 2025 [A]. The primes are also consolidating: PAE and DynCorp are now Amentum, and Vectrus and Vertex are now V2X. That leaves fewer large buyers of subcontract work. The one opening is the LOGCAP VI Small Business Suite. Under it, a small business would own the steady-state work at Army logistics readiness centres, and a large prime would be activated only on a formal mobilisation [A]. That opening is for small firms that already have readiness-centre past performance, not for a new company. A new entrant would also need a facility clearance, an auditable cost system and CMMC certification before it could bid. Distribution decides it: the buyer can be reached only through vehicles an entrant cannot hold.
The asset is the structure and the permit, not the sales relationship. Three listed operators — Lamar at $2.27B, OUTFRONT at $1.83B and Clear Channel Outdoor at $1.60B — hold the inventory that national advertisers buy, and new billboard permits are restricted or banned outright in most North American municipalities, which is what makes the existing faces worth owning. An entrant cannot build supply and cannot buy it at a price that clears. The digital half is where the growth is: OUTFRONT alone booked $649M of digital revenue in 2025.
Software serving this industry
The vertical software markets filed along the same branch — who sells to these businesses and who they would have to displace — and then the generic categories every business buys whatever it does.
A mature, consolidated market where the work is already priced by the gigabyte. eDiscovery software runs the litigation and investigation pipeline that the EDRM model describes: put custodians on legal hold, preserve and collect email, chat and files, process and de-duplicate them, review them (now with AI first-pass review), and produce them to the other side or a regulator. How it differs from the two neighbouring records: practice management (541110, Clio and peers) runs the firm's matters, time and billing; legal AI (541110, Harvey, Legora, CoCounsel) drafts and reviews the lawyer's own documents. eDiscovery handles the other side's and the client's data at volume — terabytes of custodian email — is billed per gigabyte hosted and per matter, and is bought by litigation-support teams, in-house legal operations and the service providers that resell it. Generative AI is arriving here as review tooling inside the existing platforms (Relativity aiR, DISCO Cecilia, Everlaw AI), not as a separate product. Relativity is the incumbent. In its 2021 Silver Lake release it said 198 of the Am Law 200 use Relativity and 168 use RelativityOne [C]; it confidentially filed for a US IPO on 19 March 2026 [A, company release] and in September 2026 renamed RelativityOne to Relativity aiR. No revenue is public until the S-1 is. The one public pure play shows how slowly the market grows. DISCO (Austin) reported $156.8M of 2025 revenue, up 8%, a $44.4M net loss, 1,549 customers and net dollar retention of 98% [A, 10-K]; 91% of its revenue is usage-based, and it has just moved to an all-in per-gigabyte rate. Its own 10-K names the competition: Everlaw, RelativityOne and Reveal in cloud; Nuix, OpenText, Relativity, RELX and Thomson Reuters on-premise; and the service providers. Nuix (Sydney, ASX) grew FY26 revenue 18.8% to A$263.2M with ACV of A$260.0M [A, FY26 results], but most of that is investigations and regulators rather than law-firm review. The private side is a two-firm roll-up plus one venture unicorn. K1 Investment Management merged Reveal with Brainspace (2021), then funded Reveal's purchase of Logikcull and IPRO in transactions said to be worth over $1bn (2023) [B]. Leeds Equity's Exterro bought Jordan Lawrence and AccessData [B] and then Zapproved (January 2023), with Vista keeping a minority stake [A, sponsor release]. Everlaw (Oakland) last raised a $202M Series D led by TPG at a valuation above $2B (November 2021) [A, company release]. At the corporate end, Microsoft Purview gives Microsoft 365 E5 tenants legal hold, search and premium eDiscovery inside the licence they already pay for — the cheapest hold-and-collect tool in the market is bundled. Most of the spend flows through service providers, which say so on their own sites: Epiq, Consilio and KLDiscovery (2023 revenue $345.8M [B]) host, process and staff review for law firms, largely on licensed platforms, and compete with the software vendors for the same matters. Canada has no notable home-grown review platform. OpenText (Waterloo) is Canadian but a conglomerate; Global Relay (Vancouver) sells archiving with an eDiscovery module to regulated firms; the review platforms Canadian firms use are the US ones above. Incumbent vulnerability decides it: Relativity's install base across the Am Law 200, matter data that cannot be moved mid-case, a reseller channel of service providers trained on the incumbents, and Microsoft giving away the hold-and-collect step leave no opening for a new platform, and the remaining independents are being bought.
Immigration case-management software fills government forms from one client questionnaire, tracks receipts, priority dates and expiries, and runs a multilingual client portal. The buyer is the immigration practitioner: immigration law firms first, but the same products are sold to regulated immigration consultants (Canada's RCICs, licensed by the College of Immigration and Citizenship Consultants), to non-profits, and to corporate mobility and HR teams that sponsor visas. It differs from the neighbouring records in that general practice management (541110 Legal Practice Management Software — Clio, MyCase) is horizontal across practice areas, legal AI drafting is a document tool, 9113 is the government side of the filing, and the employer-of-record record covers hiring abroad without a visa. The practitioner tier is already owned by the legal-software consolidators. In one year, 2022, three of the best-known independents were bought: Paradigm (PracticePanther, Bill4Time, MerusCase) bought LollyLaw in April [B: LawNext]; MyCase bought Docketwise in May [B: ABA Journal], and AffiniPay bought MyCase the same year — the group rebranded as 8am in August 2025 and says it serves 250,000+ professionals across the US and Canada [B: LawNext; customer count C]; and Equifax bought LawLogix (Guardian for I-9, Edge for case management) from Hyland, closing August 2022, terms undisclosed [A: Equifax release]. Mitratech had already bought INSZoom in November 2020 and calls itself 'the global leader in immigration case management software' [C, vendor release]; INSZoom now sells U.S., Canadian and global case processing. Around them sit the long-lived independents — Cerenade's eimmigration (Los Angeles, founded 1992 [C]) and CampLegal (Philadelphia, founded 2017, 3,800+ immigration professionals claimed, from $69 a month [C]). Canada's RCICs are served by Officio (Uniques Software) and by INSZoom's Canadian module, plus a crowd of very young RCIC-only tools that do not yet meet this record's bar. The corporate side is being taken by firms that are software and law firm at once. Envoy Global (Chicago; Palladium Equity Partners since September 2021, True Wind Capital and Elyan Partners in January 2022 [B]) sells software with in-house legal teams and has bought practices in London, Dubai and Cape Town. Boundless ($45.3M raised to April 2021 [A, own release]) now advertises through its own Arizona-licensed law firm. Alma, 'a modern immigration law firm', raised a $17M Series A led by Bling Capital in September 2026 on top of $5.1M seed [B]. These compete with the customer, not with Docketwise — which squeezes the law-firm buyer from above. Incumbent vulnerability decides it. Every seat a new vendor would want has an owner with a payments or HR-data business behind it, the form library has to be re-certified every time USCIS or IRCC revises a form (INSZoom promises updates within 24–48 hours), and the products are cheap enough that price is no wedge. One real weakness: Docketwise disclosed that credentials to third-party partner repositories were used to clone data in October 2025, including passport and Social Security numbers of law firms' clients; it began notifying individuals on 3 April 2026 [C, vendor notice, opened]. Trust is a selling point here, but a single incident at one brand does not open a market to an unfunded entrant. The only angle worth keeping is Canadian: an RCIC-first product built by someone inside a consultancy, sold through CAPIC — and even there INSZoom and Officio are already in the room.
The most heavily funded corner of vertical software, and the money has already picked its winners. Legal AI works on the legal documents themselves — it drafts a clause, redlines a counterparty's paper against a playbook, answers a research question with citations, summarises a deposition or a data room. How it differs from the two neighbouring records: practice management (541110, Clio and peers) runs the firm's back office — matters, time, billing, trust accounting — and contract lifecycle management (541514) is the company's repository and approval workflow for executed contracts. Legal AI sits in Word and in the research database, on the work product, and is bought by the lawyer per seat rather than by finance or operations. The two neighbours are now reaching in (Clio bought vLex and its Vincent assistant for $1B; CLM suites ship AI review), which narrows the gap further. Two incumbents own the content that grounds the answers. Thomson Reuters bought Casetext and its CoCounsel assistant for $650M in 2023 [B], and its Legal Professionals segment reported $2,868M of 2025 revenue, up 8% organic, with growth credited to Westlaw, CoCounsel and Practical Law [A]. RELX's Legal segment (LexisNexis) reported £1,806M, up 9% underlying, and says over half of all US new and renewing customers are adopting Lexis+ AI [A]. Neither breaks out an AI line, but both are growing faster on a $2–3B base than most challengers are on a venture base. The challengers are funded at a scale no newcomer can match. Harvey has raised more than $1.5B, last $550M at a $15.5B valuation co-led by Diffusion and Lightspeed in September 2026, and is reported above $400M ARR with about 80% of the Am Law 100 [B; ARR and customer figures C]. Legora (Stockholm) raised a $550M Series D led by Accel in March 2026 and a $50M extension in May, $600M in that round alone at a $5.6B valuation [B]. Eve (plaintiff firms) raised $103M at a $1B valuation led by Spark Capital, $150M in total [B]; Luminance (Cambridge, UK) raised a $75M Series C led by Point72, over $115M in twelve months [B]. The Canadian name is Spellbook (Toronto): a $50M Series B led by Khosla Ventures at a $350M valuation (October 2025), over $80M of equity in total, then $40M of RBCx debt in March 2026 to buy smaller contract-AI competitors, with a two-year exclusive with the Canadian Bar Association's 40,000+ members [B; its 'on track for $100M ARR' is C]. Wordsmith (Edinburgh, in-house teams) raised a $25M Series A led by Index Ventures [B]. The middle is where companies die. Robin AI, ranked tenth on the Sunday Times 100 Tech in 2025, failed to close a $50M round and was put up for distressed sale nine months later with about $10M ARR [B]; Spellbook is explicitly raising debt to absorb competitors of that size. Capital intensity decides it: model costs, legal engineers embedded with customers and a sales motion into Am Law firms are being paid for with rounds of $500M, the content moat sits with Thomson Reuters and LexisNexis, and the sub-scale vendors are being bought or shut down rather than displacing anyone.
Clio just raised $500M at a $5B valuation and spent $1B buying vLex. A market whose leader is actively bundling research, drafting and payments into one suite is the worst possible moment to arrive with a point solution.
Crowded with funded specialists and shadowed by Intuit, which owns the ledger the practice already runs on. The AI disruption risk also cuts against the customer: accounting practice headcount is the thing being automated. Sourced update: the incumbents are not the sleepy part of this market. Thomson Reuters' accounting-professionals segment grew 11% organically to $1.302B, and Wolters Kluwer's CCH Axcess grew 19% organically — a workflow entrant is attacking a compliance suite that is itself compounding, and that is the least favourable version of this fight.
Autodesk's AECO line alone runs at $3.583B and grew 22%, Trimble's AECO segment adds $1.499B and Bentley carries $1.46B of ARR in infrastructure engineering, and the file formats are the lock — RVT and DGN are read properly only by their owners. An entrant does not compete on features but on interoperability it does not control. Note the sizing here is a floor of $5.1B from Autodesk's and Trimble's disclosed AECO revenue alone, not a market estimate.
A $12.35B software market in 2026 growing 15.5% a year, and the two ends of it are both closed. Esri holds an estimated 35-40% of it with ArcGIS and does not disclose a revenue figure, so the leader cannot even be sized from filings; beneath it QGIS is a mature, free, OGC-compliant desktop and the open-source stack (PostGIS, GeoServer, Leaflet, MapLibre) sets the price of the core capability at zero. An entrant is squeezed exactly as in enterprise search: free below, an unpriceable incumbent above. Distribution is the harder cut. The paying buyer is a municipality, utility or provincial agency that buys on a multi-year Enterprise Agreement through procurement, and Esri Canada sells that agreement plus its own consulting practice into the same account — the channel and the incumbent are the same organisation. Note what this record is not: 541370 is surveying and mapping SERVICES, and the fragmented implementation layer sitting on top of ArcGIS is a different market with different economics. That layer is a services business, not a software business, and is not screened here.
Two private LIMS houses that have each sold into labs for about forty years hold the top of this market, and validation keeps their customers in place. LabWare (Wilmington, Delaware; founded 1987 and still run by its founder) claims 30,000 laboratories at 2,500 companies in 125 countries, with all R&D in Wilmington [C]. StarLIMS (Hollywood, Florida; founded 1986) belonged to Abbott from 2010 to 2021. Francisco Partners bought it from Abbott in July 2021, terms not disclosed [B, FP release]. On 13 January 2026 Turn/River Capital bought it outright and Francisco Partners exited [B, release], so it has had three owners in five years. StarLIMS claims 1,100+ customers in 2,000+ labs [C]. LabVantage (Somerset, NJ) is the third independent. It is private, has never disclosed an owner, and grew by buying Life Technologies' SQL*LIMS in 2009 [B]. The instrument makers sell LIMS too, and they bundle it with their hardware: Thermo Fisher (SampleManager for QC and manufacturing, Watson for bioanalysis, Core LIMS for R&D), Agilent (SLIMS, from its 2018 Genohm deal), Waters (NuGenesis) and Illumina (Clarity LIMS, for genomics labs; it is not a Revvity product). None of them reports a LIMS revenue line. The R&D notebook side is where the money went: Benchling raised $100M at a $6.1B valuation in 2021 [B, release], and Siemens bought Dotmatics for $5.1B in July 2025, a company expected to earn more than $300M in FY2025 [B, Siemens release]. Siemens does have a lab play, then, but it came through Dotmatics, not Opcenter. At the bottom, CloudLIMS publishes per-user prices: $285 a user a month at 5 users, falling to $42 at 100 users, billed annually [C, pricing page]. LabLynx, CloudLIMS and Kitchener's Scispot (about $10M raised) already serve small labs. The lock-in is the validation, not the software. A pharma QC or GLP lab that switches LIMS has to revalidate the new system under 21 CFR Part 11 or GxP, and an ISO 17025 lab has to show its accreditation body that results stay traceable through the move. Instrument interfaces, specifications and years of audit trail have to be migrated too. Customers stay for decades, which is why both leaders can be thirty-plus years old. How it differs from its neighbours. The clinical-trial and R&D data record covers EDC, CTMS and the R&D cloud, where Benchling and Dotmatics live. This record is the system of record for the sample and the result in testing and QC labs. The food-safety record covers plant-floor safety and FSMA 204 traceability, not the lab that tests the samples. Imaging/PACS is radiology. Clinical lab systems are a separate, hospital-bought market. Epic's Beaker module, Clinisys (Roper Technologies) and Orchard Software, which Clinisys bought from Francisco Partners in July 2025 [B], are listed here only to mark that boundary. Incumbent vulnerability decides it: the two leaders are stable, the instrument makers bundle LIMS with their hardware, and the low end already has vendors that publish their prices.
Adobe owns both the file format and the buyer's existing invoice, and has folded review, approval and asset management into the suite the creative team already pays for. Selling a standalone proofing tool means asking a buyer to pay twice for something bundled, which is the weakest position in this batch. Sourced update: the bundle is $17.65B of Digital Media revenue growing 11%. A standalone proofing tool is asking a buyer to pay a second time for a feature inside that.
Five vendors hold roughly three-quarters of RMM and PSA and the top two are within a point and a half of each other, so the category is contested but closed to newcomers — NinjaOne needed $500M of ARR to reach third. Note a sizing contradiction: a published figure puts RMM/PSA vendor revenue above $20B, while the same source's shares imply roughly $2.8B once you divide NinjaOne's and Kaseya's disclosed revenue by their stated shares. The larger number is measuring MSP-delivered services, not vendor licences, and is recorded here only as a caution.
The most fragmented generic category — the top five vendors hold only 20–25% — and still a walk, because the fragmentation is a symptom of low switching costs rather than an unserved segment.
Every suite vendor already ships this, and the independents are being squeezed from both ends. One analyst count puts the top seven — IBM, SAP, Oracle, DocuSign, Coupa, Icertis and Zycus — at over 30% of the market between them [C], which is a category where the buyer's existing vendor is always a credible option. Icertis claims more than a third of the Fortune 100 [C, vendor]. Meanwhile the AI drafting layer is arriving as a feature of the word processor rather than as a system of record. A new entrant would be selling a repository to buyers who already have three. The quoting and proposal end of CLM is a separate SMB and mid-market tier, and PandaDoc leads it. It sells proposals, quotes, contracts and e-signature from a public price list of $19–$65 per user a month, with quote builder and product catalogue on the Business plan and CPQ as a paid Enterprise add-on [C, vendor, checked 2026-10-08]. Its buyer is a sales team, not a legal department, and its lock-in is templates and a CRM connector rather than the executed-contract repository. That makes it cheaper to adopt and easier to leave than enterprise CLM. The same tier is crowded too: Proposify, Qwilr, Juro and DocuSign's own CLM Essentials all compete there, so it does not change the verdict. AI-native drafting tools are now attacking the CLM itself, but so far they are wearing down the incumbents' margin of differentiation, not their lock-in. Spellbook (Toronto), which began as a Word drafting and review add-in, launched Autonomous Contract Management in June 2026 and now markets it as "The CLM replacement for modern legal teams" [C, vendor]. Harvey launched a "CLM-ish" Contract Intelligence product for in-house teams in May 2026 [B, trade press]. The incumbents are absorbing the AI layer, though. Ironclad says its Jurist assistant grew AI ARR nearly sixfold year on year and was taken up by about one in three new customers, with total ARR past $200M [C, vendor release]. It partnered with Harvey in August 2025, and Legora's October 2026 integrations plug into Ironclad, Sirion, Agiloft, Conga and DocuSign rather than replacing them [B]. Even Artificial Lawyer's verdict on Spellbook's general release is only that it "could potentially replace some" in-house CLM systems [B]. No customer migration away from an enterprise repository has been reported, so erosion of lock-in is UNVERIFIED. The drafting and review layer is contested, while the system of record still holds. That leaves the verdict unchanged.
And what every business buys · 33 generic categories
Sold to every industry rather than this one, so they are filed against the software industry's own code. The same few vendors recur across most of them.
Companies in this industry · 513
Every company this research names that is filed here or beneath — the operators, and the vendors that sell to them — largest disclosed revenue first. The rank is within the company’s own six-digit industry.
| Company | Filed under | Revenue | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| AccentureNYSE:ACN | Computer systems design and related services5415 | $69.7B | 1/9 |
| ADPNASDAQ:ADP | Computer systems design and related services (except video game design and development)541514 | $21.9B | 1/326 |
| L3HarrisNYSE:LHX | Engineering services541330 | $21.9B | 1/11 |
| InfosysNYSE:INFY | Computer systems design and related services5415 | $20.2B | 2/9 |
| LeidosNYSE:LDOS | Engineering services541330 | $17.2B | 2/11 |
| AmentumPrivate | Engineering services541330 | $14.4B | 3/11 |
| Booz Allen HamiltonNYSE:BAH | Engineering services541330 | $11.2B | 4/11 |
| CACI InternationalNYSE:CACI | Engineering services541330 | $9.6B | 5/11 |
| WorkdayNASDAQ:WDAY | Computer systems design and related services (except video game design and development)541514 | $9.6B | 2/326 |
| SAICPrivate | Engineering services541330 | $7.3B | 6/11 |
| PaychexNASDAQ:PAYX | Computer systems design and related services (except video game design and development)541514 | $6.5B | 3/326 |
| ParsonsPSN | Engineering services541330 | $6.4B | 7/11 |
| OpenTextTSX:OTEX | Computer systems design and related services (except video game design and development)541514 | $5.2B | 4/326 |
| AtlassianNASDAQ:TEAM | Computer systems design and related services (except video game design and development)541514 | $5.2B | 5/326 |
| V2XPrivate | Management consulting services54161 | $4.5B | 1/7 |
And 498 more on the companies page.
Who works here
The occupations employed in Professional, scientific and technical services, most concentrated in it first. The share is measured against the whole sector, not this industry — the published cross-tabulation stops there.
Tagged to this industry
Concentrated in this sectorA
These jobs are mostly done here. An operator in this industry is competing for them against others in the same industry, not against the whole economy.
And the jobs every business has
Found across at least fourteen of the twenty sectors. But note the shape of this industry: 85% of establishments have fewer than ten employees, and at that size most of these roles are one person wearing several hats, or bought in from outside.
Inside this industry
9 rows sit directly beneath 541, and 85 in all once every level is counted. Each has a base report of its own.